Getting The Deal Through logo
Getting The Deal Through


Simon Bushell

Signature Litigation

Tuesday 29 October 2019

Welcome to this third edition of Getting the Deal Through – Complex Commercial Litigation, focusing on the multi-faceted world of high-stakes commercial litigation practised internationally. This guide continues to look at drawing out the critical themes and highlighting important areas of differentiation. Our aim is to help readers to evaluate their litigation options when faced with a choice – either at the contractual ‘juris­diction clause’ stage (usually in the early hours of the morning as one of the final clauses in a contract to be agreed when the main commercial terms have long been drafted) or when planning to issue a claim in the preferred jurisdiction. In a case where a defendant is overseas, then it will be an important part of any decision to issue a claim that the courts where the claim is issued will accept jurisdiction over the dispute. A well-advised claimant will not want to face the cost and disruption of a jurisdiction challenge unless it is a hopeless attempt at delay by the defendant (which is sometimes inevitable). Putting this into context, defendants wishing to object to the jurisdiction of the English courts can potentially raise their objection at an early stage in the English proceedings, or commence different proceedings elsewhere covering the same or substantially the same ground, or both, thus creating confusion (as well as inefficiency) and giving rise to the risk of inconsistent judgments, which might be difficult if not impossible to reconcile.

To read more
sign up for access

login here login here.

In house counsel join for free. Individual practitioners and lawyers may register for a free trial. For information on firmwide subscriptions please contact us.

Follow Getting the Deal Through for the latest updates on law and regulation worldwide

Follow us on LinkedIn